home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.cis.nctu.edu.tw!usenet
- From: terryt@mcs.com (Terry Trippany)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: How does VC++'s interface compare to VB?
- Date: 4 Jan 1996 15:26:41 GMT
- Organization: STR/Baxter Labs
- Message-ID: <4cgrjh$nst@news.cis.nctu.edu.tw>
- References: <4ca604$1o1@news.iconn.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: @159.198.73.111
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
-
- In article <4ca604$1o1@news.iconn.net>, thecrow@iconn.net says...
- >
- >I have been messing around with VB and I really like the concept, but the
- >language blows and for some reason microsoft decided BASIC doesnt need to
- >compile. Does VC++ work pretty much the same way as far as interface goes?
- Or
- >is it much less 'visual'?
- >
- >
- >--
- >The Crow - thecrow@iconn.net
- >"It can't rain all the time"
- >-Kryptology
- >
- Crow,
-
- Hello, In VC++ you don't get the flexibility of the RAD tools such as VB,
- BUT, once the interface is designed a proficient VC++ programmer can keep up.
- In fact things start to slow down in VB if you try to do anything that may be
- a little bit unconventional.
-
- However, you should probably look at Delphi if you like the VB interface,
- compiled and much superior to VB. I still prefer the C++ compilers but some
- database applications beg for Delphi. Borland was right on track with this
- tool.
-
- Good luck,
- Terry Trippany
- Strategic Technology Resources
- Chicago, IL
-
-